TORIES INCREASED DEBTS AND AUSTERITY -- Updated 27 Sept., 2019

UPDATE 27 Sept., 2019 - May resigned under great pressure and Boris Johnson was voted in by his Tories. The waste of Taxpayers' money even increased and so did the troubles, Debts and Austerity. Brexit is looming on 31 October, 2019 but BJ lets calmly roll the waggon into it; causes Ireland a border and great devastation economical, immigration, more hardship for general public. Tories and fatcats will benefit from a no-deal-Brexit  

UPDATE: 18 May, 2016 -- Tories promises of an improved economy and smears on Labour's economy has ended, so far, in highest deficit for 67 years, £115billion more debt and increased unemployment. Yet Cameron still stand in the House of Common given never an answer in PMQ and making fun of Jeremy Corbyn and Labour. How on earth does he get away with it all?

UPDATE: 18 October, 2015 -- It is hard to accept that the Tories won again after all the damages they done in their previous reign. As foretold they now show their real face. A £12billion cut in Welfare is being worked out and announced in two weeks time. They will continue with their austerity drive despite it did not work and now is uncovered as a con  because the rich got richer beyond belief. 

The promised improvement of the economy, at the General Election, has already increased the debts from £1,500trillion to £1,560trillion and the FTSE has lost 1,500 on share value ever since the Tories won the election.

Cameron has not put his promised £8billion into the NHS and the NHS is not at breaking point.

In  my opinion it is amazing how the Tory's led government can all of a sudden reduce the deficit, unemployment and promise to put in £2billion, now even £8billion into the NHS. Why were they not doing it all the time during their five years in office? Don't be taken in because as in 2010 it is nothing but fiddles and false promises again. If they win they show their real faces again

We do not know how good or bad Mr Osborne was with mathematics at school and we will never be told.

However, it is obvious now that his adding and subtracting does not work. He thinks he can stupefy the public but those days, due to the Internet, are over.  He also can put down his whitewash brush because there is not enough paint to cover it any more.

His plans of cutting back almost twice as much as before will certainly bring the UK back to the 1930 and he knows it. It is another point where he assumes the public buys it that he, PM David Cameron and the rest of the coalition is not aware of it or deny it, it will happened.

Chancellor George Osborne keeps on about reducing the deficit.  Why does he keep the same plan as for past five years is not known but the facts speak for themselves.  Even with his doubling the cuts he will not reduce the deficit but increase it because the deficit is the difference between government spending and the incoming tax.  When he cut the stamp duty tax it is already a downturn of his trying to reduce the deficit.  It is helpful to the buyers as he puts it if he only cut the stamp duty tax for lower priced houses but for higher priced properties he increasing it.  It helps the young people to get a foot on the ladder but financially it would not bring  in any extra money,

THESE ARE THE FACTS AND FIGURES OF THE LABOUR PARTY AT 2010 AND NO ALLEGEDLY "HUGE DEFICIT" HAVING TO BE TAKEN OVER BY THE TORIES. 

So far the present government had not achieved the 1 percent GDP they took over in 2010.  This recovery in 2009 was achieved by the Labour Party PM Gordon Brown after a horrendous financial crisis caused by the financiers, purposely, world wide.  Only because they had to bail-out the fatcats Banks. In Gordon Brown's last budget in March 2010 he even promised a possible reduction of VAT from 15 per cent, increase of winter fuel bills for the pensioners, increase for the nurses, police and fire brigade's wages.  I was a terrific budget to improve the life in Britain. Why people had to vote the Tories after all they have done the last time, it is hard to understand.  If they did vote them in again?????

A few weeks ago Mr Osborne announced that he would introduce a £48billion cut when they will be elected.  Previously he cut £21billion per year and it brought the people down to poverty and having to rely on food banks. It never happened since the Second World War and that was soup kitchen.  First of all there is no more money to be saved but if he follows his plan of £48billion it will bring the country to a standstill. Everything is already cut to the bare bones.

Surprisingly enough in his last budget he mentioned £27billion. Did he change his mind temporarily for the General Election and if they win will he upgrade it again to £48billion? The voters never had to think so hard where to put their cross on the election paper since the country had already five years of utter squeeze for the people and the Elite never got so rich since the Victorian time.

It is obvious Mr Osborne’s austerity did not work. He was even criticised or advised by other countries to change his plan. Mrs Merkel of Germany and even the IMF told him it won’t work. Now after five years in government the debts has increased by £500billion in spite of his austerity.  What has masterbrain done with all that money?

UK is on top of the list with 5pc of GDP

France has 4.4pc of GDP

Italy has 1.5 of GDP

Germany has 0.2 of GDP

USA was on the same level as UK but brought it down to 2.8pc of GDP

Germany and USA borrowed and invest it in the economy.  Mr Osborne was advised to do the same but, oh no, he nevertheless borrowed but did not invest it in the economic. It just vanished. Does he not realise that the more he screws down the public spending the less he gets in VAT?.   

Then there goes tenth of billions of pounds out of the country into tax haven.   The money in tax haven has now risen to £39trillion. That is where he should put the pressure on but would not because they are all too close to the Tory Party and donate heavily.  He should cut these massive bonuses and huge salaries which were only introduced by the Tory-led Government. Never before were such high salaries and bonuses paid out. No man is worth that kind of income or does such a worthwhile job to justify a £4 or £5million income a year.

Another great saving could be made by getting out of the EU. The general public had been against it for years. In the last General Election David Cameron promise a referendum of IN/OUT of Europe but as all his other promises it was never kept.  The EU costs far too much money. Again Brussels demanded £1.7billion. If it was spent into the economy it would create a lot of jobs and revenue .  According to a report the UK receive only 5 per cent businesses from the EU.  If  PM David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne would invest that money into the country it would bring down the debts and the economy would overnight be in full swing.  It would cut unemployed which would save benefits.

The UK should also stop paying benefit for children living abroad.  Also stop paying for people, when they go back to go their own country, unemployment benefits and for their family.

That is where the Chancellor should apply austerity and it would bring the necessary money plus improving the economy.

Another great saving would be to stop getting involved in wars only because the Americans say so.  Harold Wilson was the only Prime Minister who said no to the USA getting involved with Vietnam and what a slaughter that avoided. Why did Tony Blair and now David Cameron not have the courage to do the same? Especially Cameron after he was defeated by the MPs’ votes with entering Syria. This time he did not held a vote, which was not democratic, and just went ahead.  Why, because he knew people had enough of war and he would be defeated again.  Cameron’s action not only cost the country a fortune but also created very deadly enemies which we would not have otherwise.

Already Mr Cameron is trying to scare people to death with the warning of a coming Global Crunch.  Is he also trying to divert their mind so he and his cronies would not be so criticised or trying to put a shield around himself and the Tories? In 2008 the so called "Credit Crunch" but orchestrated by top financiers Mr Cameron blamed the Labour Party. Now with his prophesy of a coming "Global Crunch" why does he not prevent it this time to reach the UK?

Looking back to 2010 Mr Gordon Brown survived one of the biggest crush and ended with a plus 1pc GDP within two years. Yes, he borrowed but he had to bail-out the banks.  Had he won the election the UK would not be in that sorry state and nor the people.  His last budget was very promising for the people. Why people had to turn their back on him is never to be understood especially after the Tories already reeked havoc under Margaret Thatcher? 

The same happened when Clement Attlee gave the people the NHS and a welfare state which was the greatest gift and as a thank you for their sacrifices. The next General Election you would have thought Labour would have won with flying colour but the voters turned their back on them and voted the Tories.  It was an ungrateful act and is still unbelievable.

Daily Mirror

CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY -- Update 19 May, 2016

UPDATE: 19 May, 2016 --  Ms Goddard handed further 30,000 cases of child abuse to the police. No details given so far but hopefully there will be no exception whether politicians, celebrities or ordinary people

UPDATE:  13 July. 2015 -- It had been announced that the result of the inquiry will be published in 2030 which is outrageous. It is no justice to the victims and punishment to the offenders. The police already have 1,400  alleged offender including 76 politicians. The police special branch must had done a very thorough job therefore there is no reason for such a hold-up, unless to cover-up. 

UPDATE:  28 March, 2015 -- In my opinion the question remains whether Judge Lowell Goddard is really independent being chosen by the present Tory-led government? No offence meant towards Mrs Goddard but in view of the Tory records it does raise my suspicion. One more point I have to raise. Mrs Goddard stated that it would take four years but it did not take four years, in case of celebrities, to compile the evidence, question them, arrest them, bring them to court and convict them.  Why with the politicians?

HOME  SECRETARY
THERESA MAYA

Child abuse is not another political game to protect each other. Children were abused at an early age and life been destroyed. Jimmy Savile and Cyril Smith could have been stopped years ago if they were not protected by the Establishment.  For all we know it might still go on now only because nobody dares to stand up and bring to justice. Nobody should be above the Law.


UPDATED:  4 February, 2015 --  Finally, and hopefully finally, Home Secretary Theresa May found a new Judge to head the Child Abuse Inquiry.  It is a New Zealand High Court Judge Lowell Goddard.  No mistake she gave a big speech in the House of Common about how determined she is to bring the perpetrators to justice. If it true it would be a good thing and high time the victims get justice and the inquiry will not be again another whitewash as all the other inquiries were.

LOWELL GODDARD

UPDATE: 7 December, 2014 -- The Home Secretary Theresa May supposed to have met the victims of the cases of child abuse but she avoided them, even the meeting was set up, and went to Brussels. That is another insult. What a heartless thing to do. The meeting was supposed to put on pressure and find out when the next candidate will be chosen to chair the inquiry. The campaigner Peter Saunders was told by an official that the next chairman will be chosen in the next few weeks. What a wash off but typical for Theresa May. How must they have felt to be treated like that after all they had been through already.

LORD  LEON  BRITTAN

FIONA WOOLF

After the resignation of Fiona Woolf the inquiry into the child abuse seemed to have slipped not only from the headlines but into total silence.  Are the paedophiles hoping the public will for get it? Hopefully not. These victims had been waiting far too long which is a crime of it own.  The other reason would be playing for time. This fact is at the moment too obvious.  The first two candidates who suppose to chair the inquiry were, as it proved, too closed to the government to be totally independent. Home Secretary Theresa May must have been aware of this and therefore it was a play for time.

Now, Fiona Woolf resigned on 31 October, 2014, but there seems to be no attempt to announce another person. Surely, that could not be so difficult as to take four weeks for announcing a new and this time independent top lawyer.  

Playing for time and the guilty predators would hopefully vanish was already done since the 1980. Leon Brittan as a Home Secretary at that time to “lose” a vital file about the paedophile ring within Westminster seems to raise nothing but suspicion of a cover-up of the highest order

Even PM David Cameron promised to order a search for the file but up till today to no avail.

.

Since the first ice broke and it emerged there seems to be a huge activity of keeping the lid on it. It was not the only files supposed to have been lost. When the scandal of another paedophile ring broke in Rotherham the Police Commissioner for Crime was asked to resign. He did after a mounting pressure from the public.  No sooner did he resign the files also vanished. This scandal concerned around 1,400 children. 

Is it only when certain known persons die the books get opened and the full truth spills out? Like it was the case in Jimmy Saville and MP Mr Smith of Rochdale.  All of a sudden the children’s reports were believed and made official documents.  Hundreds of people admit now they knew about his activities but were told to keep quiet and it is known that the orders came from the very top.

A horrifying report was made about 650 missing children in Great Manchester from children homes. The shocking revelation came from Labour MP Ann Coffey who led her own inquiry.  She discovered that about 200 children a month reported that they have been sexually abused.  Yet, only 7 per cent of the 13,000 case over six years had been convicted.

The report was made after the doubtful handling of the police and council of the Rochdale and Rotherham child grooming scandals.

Ms  Coffrey said: “My observations will make painful reading for those who hoped Rochdale was an isolated case. This is a real and ongoing problem."

A great number of children said that they were approached and it emphasises the reality of “everyday Life".

"The fact that one girl abused by gang of men at age of 14 years is still waiting for her case to come to court  -- after 10 years."  It also condemns the Justice department.  Ms Coffrey said:  ”I did try and get the help, but nobody wanted to know.

"The cases which came to court their files were marked, by the Crown Prosecution Service, that the child was wearing the wrong clothes and another file where the father called her a “slag” and were dismissed with no further action.

"Yes, that is the sordid world established by people who supposed to be responsible for Law and Order. Therefore it is no wonder that the paedophiles are today spread widely, especially in the upper circle.

This is not the world the general public wants to live in and bring up their children. The only power we have is to complain and put pressure on the government who tries to cover it all up."

Daily Mirror