Wednesday 31 October 2012

CHILD ACTOR BEN FELLOWS REMEMBERS CESSPITS -- Update 25 Jan., 2015


BEN FELLOWS AND HIS WIFE JULIA
UPDATE: 25 January, 2015 -- After naming Ken Clarke he is now in court for perverting the cause of justice. The case will be heard by Mr Justice Sweeney at the Old Bailey. Mr Fellows will appear on 20 March, 2015 to a plea hearing and a two week trial will take place in July.   Why was Ken Clarke not arrested and questioned like all those accused celebrities?

Even Scotland Yard found allegedly five paedophile rings in Westminster and investigate three allegedly murders of your boys. The handed in paedophile files to Leon Brittan are missing but surely there must be copy. Nobody would not keep a copy of such an important file. Is there, yet again, another cover up and the owner threatened not to use it?

By now the public is aware of a reluctance of dealing with accusations when it concerns a politician which is totally wrong.  



UPDATE: 29 April, 2014  -  Ben Fellow turned journalist and was working for  TV. He now is fighting for justice to bring paedophiles into courts. He insists that the police covers up politicians and been given orders from above.  He accuses Ken Clarke having abused him about 20 years ago and he wants him to be arrested and charged. To fight the establishment he has gone on hunger strike. According to him he was receiving threatening phone calls in London and lives now in Lanzarote.  When PM David Cameron spent his holidays there Ben Fellow wrote him a letter demanding that Mr Cameron will make sure justice is done. Ben Fellows reckons there are other victims but too scared to come forward.

In the wake of the scandal of Jimmy Savile another actor Ben Fellows came forward and described painfully how he was abused when he was just 13 and a child actor trying to make a name for him selves. He came from a suburb of Birmingham and went against his parents’ wishes to London’s show business. He stayed 
with relatives in London.

======================================================================
IF YOU SEE AN ADVERT OF INTEREST TO YOU PLEASE CLICK ON IT FOR DETAILS
======================================================================

Ben Fellows a starry-eyed teenager was taken through VIP lounges and experienced binge-drinking and drug taking all amongst big name celebrities.  The high live hit him like a tone of bricks and he never realised the dangerous undercurrent.  

When the scandal about Savile broke lose he decided he should give facts and figures about the culture of corruption at the very centre of Britain’s entertainment.

Looking back he realised that he was used as a member of a very sinister and secret club in which young actors like him were used and abused like trophies.  The main members in this disgraceful world were all and still are household names.

He added that it is unbelievable being bedded by a current female BBC employee working in children’s entertainment. He was only 15 years old and snorted cocaine with one of Britain’s famous stars and regular on TV.

He was regularly wanted by married actors wanting young boys and almost raped in a low-class hotel room by one of the most well known TV stars of the eighties.

When he saw friends getting dragged into the seedy world of abuse, drugs, drinks and sexual abuse by empty promises he started to wake-up and got off it. However, at the age of 15 he was a regular at Springfellows at CafĂ© de Paris and Atlantic Bar and Grill. At that age you are not responsible for your action and there is always the danger if you say no you will be dropped.  He remembers a list of directors, actors, casting directors, writers, executives and producers who did or attempted to abuse him.

He spoke about a house party given by the BBC executives with a huge crowd of stars and hangers on. He still sees it as the worst abuse of trust and power. In 1990 in Clapham when a 15 year old Ben filming Model Millie for the corporation was plied with alcohol and drugs, seduced and shamelessly taken advantage of.

Ben Fellows is 37 years of age and a responsible adult. He is a successful filmmaker and lives in South London.  He stated that it took him 20 years to come to terms with the world he once lived in but with the help of his beautiful wife and supportive family he now is able to cope with the abusive world of entertainment and show business.  He looks at it as a parallel world of a cesspit and inhabited by predators and paedophiles. 
 .
It must have been terrible having to live with such memories. It has to be admired that he now is able to find the courage to cope with it. It is incredible to read about what went on behind the screen and success but at long last it comes into the open and hopefully this cesspit will be stamped out.

Good luck for the future Ben Fellows to you and your family. Be proud of yourself to have been able to get out of it.  



CAMERON AT CELEBRATIONS




It seems that Mr Cameron, the UK Prime Minister, does best, sorry loves best to go around at Celebration and show himself as the great benefactor.




DAVID CAMERON AT PARALYMPICS

The truth is that he attended the Paralympics sitting there and watching the struggle of disabled achieving Gold, Silver and Bronze medals. Even has the audacity to go up and presents their medals. Unfortunately only the Chancellor George Osborne was booed by 80,000 it should also be David Cameron and even more so because he initiated the Disability Benefits to be cut. After all his high education in top private schools what has that man got in him you expect more principles.





Next we see him in front of 10 Downing Street the residence of Prime Ministers smiling and glowing being surrounded by the Save The Children fundraisers. It is the first time that this organisation had to appeal to the public for funds and to high light it went to the Prime Minister. The Save The Children Fund experienced first hand how the children and families in the Midlands and North of England starving, living in appealing housing condition and have no money for warm clothing.  Yet the man who causes all this hardship and lives on the fat of the land stands there smiling and fluffing his peacock feathers. Britain is the seventh richest country in the world.


                                                PRIDE OF BRITAIN CELEBRATION


Now, he was at the Pride Of Britain celebration which has been a great invention for ordinary people being celebrated for their bravery and outstanding deeds. It is by nomination from the public and chosen by the panel. It is across all ages from children to old age pensioners who done an incredible bravery or good deed.  The Prime Minister David Cameron who done nothing but causing hardship attended the function bathing in the limelight and strutting about like peacock

Is there no feeling in the man for others? After all he had to experience himself the struggle of being handicapped in his son and father. Although the money was there and it did help, no doubt, but still he must have seen how disabled people have to try for every movement. Did that not reach him? If it did, how can he be so callous and cut the Disability Benefit, Child benefit, break the NHS, many other benefits and sits back calmly letting the energy suppliers increase the bills for hard-up people and pensioners? THIS WILL CAUSE MANY MORE DEATH THIS WINTER.

Is this the true face of the Prime Minister and does he really want that for HIS people who had face in him and voted for him?




CAMERON ABANDONED ANOTHER PROMISE



In his election manifesto he promised to be tough on crime. Looking back it makes it obvious that he never met one of his promises. UK and especially the major cities are swamped by crime and the police had a hard job before to keep it down. Therefore the Conservatives gave this promise to get voters on their site because people were fed-up being attacked on the streets and in their houses.

Yes, the Conservatives won the election, only by a minority and built a coalition with the Liberal Democrats.
The moment they were in power they abandon most if not all of their promises including the one being tough on crimes. Furthermore, they cut the police force right down in sacking 16,000 police officers at a time when the streets were riddle with crimes. Especially the elderly and disabled people were not safe because they couldn’t fight back.

Now the Home Secretary Theresa May announced that she will half the sums for crime prevention.  London will cut from £57million to £23million in 2013/14.  Wales from £3.1million to £1.2million.

This will affect the CCTV which is the greatest help to catch criminals, youth project, street lighting and gang prevention work.

No wonder Theresa May is the favourite of David Cameron in spite of her many mess-ups and frequent calls for her to be forced out or her willingly resign from her post.

These further cuts will also show in losing thousands of staff and especially 6,500 frontline officers.

All these reduction will provoke more crime and it will backfire in having more criminals locked up in what they claim in overfilled prisons. This also will result into more cost of keeping these criminals which in the long run does not justify the means of cutting down the police force as well as on crime prevention. When you cut down the impact has also to be looked at. This apparently is not the case made by the government and therefore it will have a chaotic impact on the public.

Next month there will be an election of 41 police and crime prevention commissioners. They are not given an idea what the budget will be and only after 15 November they will have to face the budget they have to work with.  The new commissioners will be in charge of chief constables and take over crime prevention budgets. This is not democracy as it should be. In a democracy all the facts are on the table and the candidates are able to discuss the situation with voters.

Apparently the cities which were worst hit by last year riots have to face the biggest cut. Birmingham will be cut from £1.5million to £620,000, Manchester from £1million to £415,000 and Leeds from £1.1million to £478,000.

CUTTING ALL THE BENEFITS AND SECURITY BY CUTTING DOWN THE POLICE AND THEIR FUNDING MAKES YOU WONDER IF THEY FIND ANYTHING ELSE TO THROW AT THE PUBLIC.  THEY FORGOT THAT IS IT THE PUBLIC WHO VOTED THEM IN AND NOW THEY ARE KICKING THE PUBLIC IN THE TEETH NON-STOP.

Tuesday 23 October 2012

CHANCELLOR OSBORNE IN FIRST CLASS WITHOUT PAYING -- Updated 10 June,2015


UPDATE: 10 June,  2015 --  Looking back it raises the questions "What else is he fiddling if he is so desperate not to pay the full first class fare?"

Would he also claim the first class fare on his expenses? Greed does not seem to have any limit. His is a multi-millionaire besides he does not have to pay for the first class fare, it goes on his expenses. At the same time he squeezes every penny out of the public.



UPDATE:   3 October 2013 --  As the Chancellor George Osborne stated in his speech at the Conservative Conference Party he does not agree with anybody getting something for nothing. His actions are contradictory.



The Chancellor George Osborne tried to sit in a First-Class seat on a Virgin Trans with a standard ticket. The reason behind this not so decent behaviour was that the claiming for expenses was cut back to the price of a standard ticket.

His aide contacted the train manager to let Mr Osborne sit in the first class department. The train manager insisted that he paid the difference. Mr Osborne refused and the aide pointed out that he could not possible expects Mr Osborne to sit in a second class department.

Witnesses saw Mr Osborne boarding the train in Wilmslow and went straight to the first class. His aide also asked the ticket collector could Mr Osborne remain in the first class with his standard ticket. The ticket collector refused and told him if he wants to stay he has to pay en extra £160. At first the aid told him that he couldn’t pay and Mr Osborne could not be expect to sit in the second class. At the end Mr Osborne pad the difference.  So it was said or did they just give up.

Later on there was a statement that the aide went to the train manager and paid the different. At no time was there a disagreement or argument. Furthermore, was stated that the Chancellor had to change his diary and had to board a different train. Since the second class was crowded he immediately upgrades his ticket to the first class.

However, it was also revealed that Mr Osborne travelled several times in first class with a standard ticket and so did other MPs since the change of the allowance being too claimed was only for a standard ticket.  They do have a hard time managing their money at the end they might to put their hands into their own pockets to meet expenses


AND  PEOPLE  LIKE  THAT LOOKING  DOWN  ON  ORDINARY  PEOPL


CHANCELLOR  GEORGE  OSBORNE  HARD  AT  WORK  AT  THE  HOUSE  OF  COMMONS  IN  PARLIAMENT

THE CHANCELLOR IS NOT ASLEEP -- HE IS READING THE BOTTOM LINE OF HIS PAGE

EU PLANS TO PAY MIGRANTS MOVING TO BRITAIN


After the disastrous ruling of the fishery industry where fisherman have to throw almost a third of dead fish overboard because it is over their quota and growing fruit all the same size which needs more chemical spray on it to achieve it plus to grow bananas straight it leaves us wonder about sense of the EU. Now we hear they are working on a new plan whereby jobless people get send to Britain with an incentive of a £1,000. They also could get travel expenses. They also would be paid £250 to help them to be interviewed and £830 for re-location cost.

Is that what Britain gets for its £19billion membership? plus all sorts of other payments.

Surely, it is on the top all their previous brainless rulings and decision. From a start Britain has 2.5million unemployed and amongst them over a one million youngsters who don’t seem to have a chance.  Brussels explanation for this hare brain scheme is that the tax-payers-funded scheme would give thousands of youngsters to move to Britain to seek employment and British youngster could use the scheme to move to the EU to work.

WHERE  IS  THE  SENSE  IN THAT?  Also people will be using the scheme to get money fraudulent.

The scheme is for job seekers age 18 to 30 and will be match with suitable vacancies.

The start has been made in Spain where youth unemployment is over 50 per cent. It will be extended to Germany, Denmark and Italy and eventually across the EU. Their Target is to help 5,000 people gain jobs through the EU scheme.

The statistic shows that tens of thousands of migrant have forced out British worker out of work. Prime Minister David Cameron wants Brussels to re-write the rules that allow Europeans to take jobs in Britain. When Mr Cameron visited two factories in recent weeks he found out that 50 to 60 per cent were people from the EU countries.

Tim Aker who is part of the ‘Get Britain out of the EU’ campaign stated that unemployment caused by the EU should be solved by the EU and not sends to Britain to force British people out of a job.

Sunday 21 October 2012

CAMERON'S IN/OUT REFERENDUM ON EU -- Updated 1 June, 2016


PM DAVID CAMERON
UPDATED: 1 June, 2016 --
Vote for the IN/OUT of EU is on 23 June, 2016 and already scandals appear that non-British people have received voting cards. Is it a slip-up or not. Can we have one guess?

UPDATED: 22 May, 2015 -- Well, the voters fell for it again and hopefully for all our sake Cameron will deliver this time. Time will tell.

UPDATE: 16 February, 2015 - - There are definitely great changes on the way. PM David Cameron promised now to bring the referendum forward to 2016, Ian Duncan Smith, head of the Department of work and Pensions, found all the right keys on his I.T. to set up the promised Universal Credit and is able to pay the people their due money in only a few months' time. Banks and Corporations start paying their taxes and the Treasury already received hundreds of thousands of pounds. Will the voters fall for this again? Hopefully not. Remember 2010!

UPDATE: 22 December 2014 -- The referendum on IN/OUT of the EU being amended and the Labour Party demands more amendments. Details are not given to the public. The major issue is, in the public eye, that David Cameron promised in his election manifesto in 2010 he would give the people of Britain a referendum if he won the election. It could have been a major point for people putting their mark in the wrong box. As you can see his promises were never met. 

Now it is 2017 by which he is hoping to be elected again. Would the public fall for another promise which might or most probably might not be kept again?  In General the public had the worst austerity and nothing but false promises. It might change now because the election is coming closer.


UPDATE:  22 June 2013 --  David Cameron put now an IN/OUT referendum to the vote of House of Commons MPs. The many stages are called reading and the first reading of IN/OUT was almost unanimously voted for OUT. The second reading for 2017 was turn down by the majority. Everybody demands it now and had been demanding it for long time. David Cameron dragged it out and now it is too late for passing it through the various stages to be effective before the general election in 2015. It was nothing but a election stunt and Cameron thought he could get away with it.Now he will sign another treaty for seven years throwing tens of billions of pounds to an EU which nothing but squanders money by the millions and billions. Well done Mr Cameron.


UPDATE:  4 April 2013 -- Does David Cameron really still believes he can retrieve the power from Brussels or is he only trying to blind the public to stretch the time till he can sign for another seven years? The public is up in arms and wants out because of the money wasted in 

At long last David Cameron announced his true intention of not having an in/out referendum on EU. It was revealed during the PRIME MINISTER QUESTION TIME.

The House of Commons has a rule of having a Prime Minister Question time in Parliament where he has a duty to be accountable to the British People when he is questioned by MPs. The Speaker of Commons points at the MP who had raised his/her hand and is then allowed to put his/her question forward.  Prime Ministers can be evasive but still have to answer the question.

Mr Cameron did not comply with this rule when asked by the Labour MP Chris Bryant about the links between Downing Street and Mr Murdoch. Mr Cameron’s answer was that until he receives an apology for accusation he will not answer the question. This was against the rules of the Parliament but Mr Cameron, not so surprisingly, got away with it because the Speaker John Bercow did not call David Cameron out of order and made him answer the question. 
.
It was totally out of order because the very name Prime Minister Question Time says it all and is part of democracy.

Then Labour MP Natasha Engel put the question to Mr Cameron that Education Secretary Michael Gove stated if there would be a referendum on in/out of EU, he would vote to leave.  She asked the Prime Minister how he would vote.

This time Mr Cameron answer was that he does not want an in/out referendum because he is not happy to leave the EU. At long last Mr Cameron speaks his true intention as before he was hedging all the time.  No wonder the press calls him ‘Dodgy Dave’.  A Prime Minister is there to state openly his intention and inform the public. And not dodging and diving, thinking the public does not see it.

He has done the same with signing papers granting Scotland the right for an in/out referendum of the United Kingdom. Soon after that he stated that he does not want Scotland to leave which is completely contradictory.  Deep down he does want Scotland to leave because there is the majority of Labour voters which would or could dip the scale in the next general election.

Regarding the EU Mr Cameron stated further that he thinks the majority of the public wants a new settlement with the EU. The new settlement will be in a referendum put to the people to vote on. It will also be put into his next manifesto. Mr Cameron safe yourself for both, the time and paper. As he so arrogantly put it that the ‘majority’of people will not vote on either of it.

Mr Cameron also enlightened the public that he intends to put it into his manifesto which is  a pledge to seek  to negotiate the repatriation of significant powers from Brussels. This will be followed by a new referendum to choose between the “new deal” and the status quo. However, there will be no mentioning of in/out of the EU on the pallet papers.

Doubtfully these pledges and promises would stop the Tories’ MPs migrating to the UKip who are determined about the in/out vote.  Mr Cameron still thinks that he can smokescreen with fine words and pledges. The public never seen one pledge fulfilled from the last election manifesto. Also the words to pledge to seek negotiation to repatriate powers from Brussels are to thin to be believed.  Mr Cameron seems to be turning more and more into a man who convinces himself during his speeches and feels full of pride about having delivered a great speech but as they say "action speaks louder than words".

Friday 19 October 2012

TORIES CASHING IN BY BREAKING UP NHS - Updated 31 March, 2017

In my opinion: Cameron's final betrayal of the people's trust when he sold off a major part of the NHS for £780million to companies some having already a bad reputation. A PM with no principles and does as long it brings money. He should never been allowed to touched the NHS!!!!!



PM DAVID CAMERON
Update 31 March, 2017
New Chancellor Philip Hammond never mentioned NHS or Schools in his budget. Both are in great financial troubles.




Updated 26 Dec., 2016 --
The new PM Theresa May is no better because she lets the Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt introduce more cuts to the NHS.

It brings, the already run-down NHS, into a final stage. The sooner there is an election to get the Tories out the better. People cannot afford to lose their NHS and they also do not want to. It is all purposely  organised by the Tory Government.

UPDATED: 16 February, 2015 -- By now David Cameron and friends managed to bring the NHS down to breaking point. Well, he achieved what he set out for. The only hope is that the voters will vote Labour to rescue the NHS.


UPDATED:  20 Dec. 2013 -- It had been revealed that David Cameron will hand out 200 contracts to private companies to take over work in the NHS. 


Already, the one which received a private contract are making headlines with scandals of fraud and sending information to private consultancies without the consent and knowledge of the patients. Another security firm their data was stolen.  Is David Cameron a bad judge of characters or a could not care less? With the new 200 contracts being given in January it is a selling the NHS through the back door.




It is now and open secret that the Tory party is bent over back ward to break up the National Health Service. In David Cameron reshuffle he made sure that Jeremy Hunt takes over the Department of Health knowing very well Hunt would back him.

The first private company Circle took over the Hitchingbrooke hospital in Cambridgeshire. It is also no secret that Circle donated £1.4million to the Conservative party. However, in the short time Circle Health is running the hospital it reported that it is almost broke.

==================================================

PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERT.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

It was also reported that the Conservative received over £10million from contacts with private health connections.  Isn’t that lobbying? The very thing David Cameron gave a great speech with fine words about it to stop lobbying. Oh no not another broken promise. Also do we remember David Cameron promise that the NHS is save in his hands? Oh, yes, he got his hands on it alright.

The Labour Party also revealed that these donations of over £10million were accumulated since 2001 when the Conservative Party was the opposition. It looks like they planned it all the time.  Now they destroy the NHS for the more than already wealthy friends.

As soon as Jeremy Hunt became Health Secretary he short listed Circle Health’s spin chief Christina Linnet as his media boss.  She used to work for Andrew Langley who was Health Secretary before.

Furthermore the record shows that Tory MP Mark Simmons is paid £50,000 a year for a 10 hour per month by Circle.  If that isn’t lobbying what is?  On a whole Circle was given a 10year contract to run the Hinchingbrooke Hospital for the sum of £1.2billion. Within a few months the hospital sunk to the 19 place on the list.

Circle’s directors hoping it will be one of many and have already a business plan to clinch a contract for £8billion. All this went ahead in spite of the warning that patient care could suffer.  Well. Right at the beginning of Cameron’s devious plan it shows already that Circle and all the other private companies do not achieve the standard which is required and was there before.  In the last few months only there was on scandal after another but the Conservatives don’t take any notice or care and plough on to get more private companies just to get their sponsorship for Cameron’s party

Furthermore, it was stated that friends of the Tory party supposed to do very nicely out of it. But the extent of it would shake the public and the close link between Conservative Party and Circle health is anything but right.

Apparently the donations to the Tories regarding the takeover of Hinchingbrooke hospital came form four City executives of giant investment companies that have large stakes in Circle.  The company main shareholders are Lansdowne Partners 29 per cent, Invesco Perpetual 21.9 per cent, BlueCrest 7.1 per cent and Odey Asset Management 21.1 per cent.  

The companies stated that there was no link between the companies and the Tory Party. The donations were made by private individuals.  Now isn’t that clever.

The spokesman declared that all donations to the Conservative Party are properly and transparently declared to the Electoral Commission, published by them, and comply fully with Electoral Commission rules.

OF COURSE, HOWEVER ELSE WOULD WE THINK THEY HAVE DONE IT?

I THINK THE PUBLIC MUST BE ALL LOOKING LIKE IDIOTS TO THEM AND TO SOME EXTENT THEY BOUND TO HAVE THAT EXPRESSION, UNLESS THE LAST ELECTION RESULT WAS FIDDLED. 

TO VOTE THEM IN AGAIN AFTER THE DEVASTATING RESULTS BY MARGARET THATCHER IS UNBELIEVABLE.  



UK MPS IN LANDLORDS' RACKET - UPDATED 22 May, 2015



UPDATED: 22 May, 2015  --  In my opinion nothing had been done to stop this racket which cost the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds. Most of them are friends of Cameron and therefore a blind eye is turned towards it




UPDATE:  23 July 2014 -- As always when one scandal gets overtaken by other news the first one dies a natural death and sure enough nothing had been done apart from promises that they will stop renting. This again Mr Cameron and his Cabinet failed in their leadership to see the matter effectively through.

  

UPDATE 20 OCTOBER 2012  --- The latest news on the subject is that the MPs could (please note the word - could) be banned from renting homes from each other. The Parliamentary Watchdog promised to look into it and closing the loophole. It is amazing when their is a scandal there is always a Labour MP being pointed at. Although being Labour and for what it should stand for it is twice as wrong.



Already the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority indicated that MPs will still be allowed to claim rent at the same time as they letting their property to other tenants. So far 27 MPs had been found out to claim rent and letting their property to others. Apparently they also moved out of their homes into rented accommodation when the rules changed and they were not being able to claim for mortgage interest. 


A new revelation of MPs furthering their income is they are renting out their property to their own colleagues. Herewith they have a guaranteed income, the MPs who renting the property claiming it on their expenses and the taxpayer pays for it. This method ensures that the owners eventually ends with a well provided nest-egg not to say that these properties are most properly top of the list.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority is planning to expose the MPs Owners of the properties.  To be sure nothing was done so far and most probably nothing will be done.
=================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
=================================================

The Common Speaker John Bercow was totally against the disclosure for the reason of security and privacy of the MPs. Good story. In his letter to the IPSA chairman Sir Ian Kennedy he warned that the MPs have great concern to disclose the details under the freedom of information laws. He pointed out further that this could lead to a great security risk.

On the other hand the Security minister Mr Brokenshire voiced his opinion that if there is any wrong doing it should definitely be investigated.

Labour MP John Mann added that he has no problem with MPs renting out properties but the public is entitled to know.

Another revelation of which most of the people didn’t know or think about it. For the MPs it is not a bad little scheme to built-up a property empire through claiming it on expenses which again comes out of the taxpayers’ pocket.  The MPs certainly never miss a trick to fill their pockets. 

David Cameron should stop their expenses' claim as a measure of austerity. Especially now since they have a  great salary's increase besides they so many other incomes from non-executive directors to untold shares in various companies. Nobody can claim their rent, energy expenses and petrol on taxes yet everybody does their job so why the MPs are an exception?  When they go to meetings all expenses are paid for anyway by the people who organised it.

IF YOU THINK  ABOUT IT, IT IS A LEGAL SWINDLE AND THE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO PAY.



Wednesday 17 October 2012

CAMERON KEPT EMAILS FROM LEVENSON INQUIRY -- Updated 9 April, 2014





DAVID CAMERON AND REBEKAH BROOKS 

AND A LAUGHING HORSE
UPDATE:  9 April, 2014 -- Have they been forwarded at the court case of Rebekah Brooks? Or do they not exist any more. My guess, we will never know.

UPDATE:   25 November 2012 -- Every other person would have been forced to hand them over or their house invaded by the police. Is the government, including the Prime Minister above the Law? Lord Leveson is publishing his report on the findings this week. How can he without having all the facts?



UPDATE 15 November 2012 -- Apparently up till now he still has not handed over the emails which should not be allowed. This is an investigation in to a crime committed of phone hacking and therefore David Cameron should be forced to hand it over. It concerns about 150 emails between David Cameron  and Rebekah Brooks and also Andy Coulson. Is that not called perverting the cause of justice?


THE VERY FACT THAT DAVID CAMERON REFUSES TO HAND THEM OVER PROVES THERE MUST BE EVIDENCE TO THE CASE IN IT.


Apparently dozens of emails between David Cameron and Rebekah Brooks were not handed over to the Levenson’s inquiry. According to Cameron he was acting on personal legal advice. Since we talking about legal, isn't withholding evidence from an inquiry is surely perverting the cause of justice and therefore not legal besides a criminal act? He also kept the emails from the inquiry between him and the ex-News of the World editor Mr Coulson whom he employed as the Tories’ top spin doctor.

It was also discovered that some emails where sent when Coulson was still working for Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper.

All this came to light just weeks before Lord Justice Leveson is going to deliver his final report on Press standards.

A Government lawyer decided that these emails were not ‘relevant'. Of course, it would be a government lawyer who would state this. The fact is that these emails would reveal the apparently unusual close relationship between the PM and former Sun editor and Chief Executive Brooks.

Rebekah Brooks and her husband Charlie were at Eton with Mr Cameron and were members of the “Chipping Norton“ set based in his Oxfordshire seat.

No report would be without the sponge from Downing Street wiping the slate clean. A spokesman said that all the material the inquiry asked for was given to them, In common with previous Prime Ministers, the PM received Government legal advice in order to co-operate fully with a judicial inquiry. Now here we have it.  Just one question. Would a Government Legal advice be different if there was any evidence in the emails pointing to a wrong doing, in other words criminal offence?

All these happening quietly in the background but came to light when the news broke that Brooks received a pay-off of over £7million. At the time she was forced to quit because of the phone hacking evidence. This includes cash, which most properly means tax avoidance, pension’s payments and use of a chauffeur driven car.

Brooks’ court case was postponed till next September when she faces charges on phone hacking.
First of all, who is paying all these over £7million?

It seems to escalate; many bankers who made nothing but creating bankruptcy. The higher they are the unaccountable they will be for their various diabolical and sometimes criminal actions. Not only that but when they eventually get sacked they get one of the highest payout plus pensions and that wouldn’t be a state pension, would it? How is all this justifiable at a time of UK's recession?

Any ordinary worker getting sacked gets nothing. Besides all these undeserved millions are getting paid by the taxpayers. That’s where David Cameron’s AUSTERITY plans should start. The problem is they are all buddies and friends and he certainly stands by them.  



DAVID CAMERON ON A HORSE    OH DEAR    OH DEAR

Thursday 11 October 2012

GAS PERKS REFUSED AND ELECTRICITY PRICE INCREASES

Update 15 August, 2020 -- 8 years on nothing has improved on the contrary its gone worst. After Cameron came May and now Johnson. By now 130,000 people, mostly OAP, have died of hyperthermia; 60,000 of CV19 because Johnson did not react and put necessary measures in straightaway; now we facing massive job losses, home evictions and recession. Johnson put the final nail into the coffin.

UPDATE 13 OCTOBER 2012  --  Npower will follow suits with 8.8 per cent and now the customers have no choice but pay and pay. This is nothing but racketeering. All big energy suppliers had bit profits last year and therefore there was no need for those massive increase.  Chancellor George Osborne made a big noise and show attacking the energy suppliers but other than that the government does nothing against them.  Also what is Ofgem getting paid for? They never do any

thing.

To crown it all it would be no surprise if the government cuts the winter fuel supplements now.

IS THAT WHAT DAVID CAMERON CALLS TO CREATE AN ASPIRATION NATION ?????

UPDATE 12 OCTOBER 2012 -- I only just stopped writing and there come the news of an increase of six or seven per cent in crease on gas.  Last year only it was increase by 10 per cent despite David Cameron had a meeting with the gas and electricity board promising he would make them hold the price. This government cannot cut wages, benefits and let the gas, electricity, food and petrol prices spiral sky high. How do they think people cope with and where they get the money from to pay for it all?

Next thing we read about the huge profits they made and bonuses they paid to their fat cats. 

British Gas gives staff a £200 perk on their bill. The whole top management has decided to turn down the perk and hope their top rivals will do the same. Although it wont’ be missed with an income of £1.3million a year for the chief executive Mr Sam Laidlow, his finance chief Nick Luff and British Gas managing director Phil Bently, their salaries are unknown but surely not far behind.

They feel like it is not necessary to receive this perk at the time of austerity. Although it is a drop in the ocean for the Centrica’s board but nevertheless a nice gesture. The rest of staff is still receiving their perk. The insiders pointing out it would still give the wrong impression.

Southern Electricity on the other hand will increase their prices from 15 October 2012 by 10 per cent. Furthermore, Ian Marchant refused to give up his staff discount in spite of receiving a salary of £1.2million last year. His bill will be cut by 12 per cent in spite of his huge salary; the customers will have to face another huge electricity price rise.

Mr Marchant commented that he thinks to donate his perk back to the company wouldn’t be very sensible.
Npower gives the staff £100 vouchers but wouldn’t comment whether the board members would take it this year.

E.ON stated that their chief executive Tony Cocker does not take the staff reward.

Scottish Power does not give their staff a discount scheme.

EDF Energy gives their staff £48 off their bills but couldn’t say if their chief executive took it.

Admirable as the refusal of the perks is but it is only a small contribution towards the company. The real impact is the bonuses for the top management and some of the staff which really adds on. Surely with around one million of pound a year salary it would be well paid for their work. There is no need for bonuses on top of it especially at hard times as they are at the moment. David Cameron always preaches austerity but he never whispers to cut the bonuses or stops them because most of them are his friends who donate to the Conservative Part which soon be rivalling with Fort Knox.

This austerity the ordinary people imposed by David Cameron and his Conservative Party is all wrong while the fat cats getting millions of salaries and bonuses. Again he does nothing to stop the increase of electricity. People already had problems to pay the bills and now a increase of 10 per cent will hit them hard and many will not be able to pay it. There is no need to aim for greater profits apart from the bosses get more bonus and the shareholders more dividends. 






Wednesday 10 October 2012

REMEMBER CAMERON'S SPEECH AT PARTY CONFERENCE 2012 == Update 3 October 2014


UPDATE: 3 October, 2014 -- In spite of it all the previous promises by PM David Cameron about the NHS which is by now half privatised. To emphasized it more the PM David Cameron spoke of his disabled son Ivan who died. Why does he speak about his son Ivan he does not show he means it?  At his speech at the Conservative Conference in Birmingham he promised again to increase the budget of the NHS and will not privatise it. He and his great Chancellor George Osborne also promised further cuts in benefits.  Promises,  promises and nothing but contradictions apart from the promises of cuts.



UPDATE 15 OCTOBER 2012 --  There are at the moment 1,000 disabled people who died because of the Disability Benefits being taken away. Some might not be the cause altogether but it is still too high a number to justify David Cameron's actions.


Well, people know now what to expect even he wrapped it up all in a fine worded speech with all emotional points. Hopefully the public will not be blindfolded either by Boris Johnston given them all a cheerful time, he too has that same believes and outlook as David Cameron.

David Cameron spoke about his son and father, both being disabled.  Yes, it must have been distressing and nobody will deny that but having experienced it so closely why does he cuts cold bloodedly the disabled people's benefit. It does not add up. Especially they have it much harder then David Cameron's father, being a multi-millionaire; they have to battle with the money and every penny counts.

He spoke of the Paralympics how wonderful and inspiring these athletes were but coming from David Cameron it is hypocritical. No doubt the athletes were but how can anyone sit there watching their determination to overcome the disability and cut their Disability Benefits at the same time. He is hitting and hurting the poorest of the poor. Yet again, he emphasised it in his speech that there will be austerity and further cuts have to be made. Therefore, these words about his son and father ring hollow and he never applies austerity and cuts to himself and the rest of them.

He was willing to spend £206million (updated £1billion) on a contract with a French firm ATOS not even an English company to create jobs. To send disabled people back to work. 32 (updated over 1,000) people died because of it and with 3million unemployment where have disabled people got a chance to get employed. 

==================================================

PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

He spent £330.000 on a contract with a company organising wake-up calls for youngster to get them out of bed and back to work. Again where are the jobs? The majority would not be at home lying in the bed if there were any jobs available. 


He spent hundreds of million of pounds on a management consultancy to sack nurses and doctors at the NHS. Yet, if necessary at all it should have been the directors’ job of the NHS; there again if he spend that money on the NHS there would be no need to sack nurses and doctors.

There is a whole string of mismanagement were all of a sudden the money was there to be spend all the wrong way and that is were austerity should start.

Apparently David Cameron will still carry on with his original plan. The truth is that the ordinary people are already so cut down, there is no money to be cut. Already the food parcels are on a big increase which is a disgrace for a country and its people like Britain. . Unemployment is growing at an alarming rate.  After years in office the country has a 0.4 per cent deficit instead of yet another promise growth of 0.2 per cent but David Cameron talks of healing process. Where does this man gets it from? He still blames the Labour and yet the Gordon Brown handed the country over with a 1 per cent credit which vanished within two months.

He was talking about sink or swim. Well it is the ordinary people who sink and David Cameron and the Conservatives do the swimming. The party faithful gave him a standing ovation because they swim with him. This party keeps splitting the public into two sections and with a great gulf between it. Therefore, his famous phrase ‘we are all in this together’ he would not know what hit him if he had to cope with what he hands out to people.

The promise of a referendum after the next election is nothing but a promise again to catch votes. If he would mean it he would have done it all this time or at least now. He already promised it in the last election manifesto and when it came to it dropped it.

MEALS ON WHEELS PRIVATISED AND PRICE RISE -- Update 18 Nov., 2014



Now many councils stopped or planning to stop the Meals on Wheels because of the already 40 per cent budget cuts and there is a further cut promised by the Government. 

How do these fatcats in Parliament think, if ever, housebound or bed-bound people survive. It is known that the politicians wine and dine on £4billion a year. That's were cuts should be.


UPDATE: 18 Nov., 2014 -- Now due to the severe cuts on council budgets many council have abandon  Meals-on-wheels services to a generation who deserves everything after their sacrifices they made. The Government forgets who put them there swimming in wealth and freedom. It would have been a different picture if that did not give their all at the front as well as back home in the last war.

This Government succeeded the most heartlessness, selfishness and greediest there has ever been.

The meals on wheels were privatised by the ToryLibDem coalition in Birmingham two years ago. The contract was given to a private firm called ‘ICare’ which is anything what the company’s name stands for. As with all private companies they too want to make a profit and have to.

The staff of 30 received a letter from the company’s director stating their wage will be cut from £8.13 to £6.19 plus their holiday and sick payment will be cut too. Furthermore, they can lose their job and given a week’s notice.

This is certainly a terrific shock to the drivers who use their own cars having to account for the wear and tear of the car and double insurance because they use it for business use. They reckon that by taken all this in account they would end up with £4 per hour. Their colleagues who haven’t got a car were already sacked.

While this was all going on the same bosses increased the meals on wheel from £4.10 to £5.71.  It also has to be paid for whole month ahead. The people who dealing with these elderly said that they were completely confused.

One of the drivers pointed out they were sold out. The elderly people they service rely on the hot meal once a day and for most it is their only outside contact.  They were shocked how the company is treating the drivers as well the Old Age Pensioners. They stated further that they deserve better. This coalition and their friends of private companies forget that it was this generation who saved Britain from the Nazi by sacrificing everything.

ICare defended their decision by stating that Birmingham City Council stopped paying the 20 per cent VAT but hold on a minute 20 per cent of £4.10 would be £0.82 and does not justify a £1.61 increase plus considering the decrease of the drivers' wages by £2 which adds up altogether to a £3.61 less £0.82 VAT makes it an increase of £2.79. Do they really CARE which is doubtful. From a start meals on wheels should not be charged VAT.  Again a point made by the Coalition of them and us. The coalition refuses to tax the Mansions but charge meals on wheels VAT.

Furthermore, the Chairman Stephen Emmanuel added: "The alternative was to make all employees on the contract redundant." This shows the whole attitude and it starts right from the top of the government down to companies' bosses.  

ANOTHER   DISGRACE   FOR   THE    COALITION   BUT   WILL   THEY   CARE?  NO