CAMERON SEVERELY CRITICISED BY POLISH FOREIGN MINISTER

Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski criticised David Cameron severely in a conversation with ex-finance minister Jacek Rostowski. It was secretly taped and the leaked to Poland's Wprost new magazine.

POLISH FOREIGN MINISTER
RADOSLAV SIKORSKI

It is especially damaging because Poland was always on the side of Britain.  Mr Sikorski is closed to many Tories because he was a member of the hell raising Bullingdon Club of which Cameron, Johnston, Osborne and many others of the Tory's Elite were also members. Mr Sikorski voiced that Mr Cameron is a serial incompetent, A man who couldn't not punch his way out of a paper bag. He also pointed out that Mr Cameron is a figure of scorn in Europe's capitals who failed, big time, in crucial negotiations.

By the end of the conversation Mr Sikorski did not leave a good hair on David Cameron. Is it surprising the way Mr Cameron goes on in the UK as well as in the EU? Mr Cameron tried to stop Jean-Claude Juncker from becoming President. He consulted the major countries in Europe and tried to convince them but he did not consider that there 28 countries altogether which most probable will see him defeated.

Mr Cameron also suffered another humiliation when he saw a copy of the EU president's five-year plans. It did not contain one suggestion of the reforms Mr Cameron was aiming for. Mr Herman van Rompuy visited 10 Downing Street today. Mr Cameron remarked afterwards that he had a full and frank discussion with Herman van Rompuy. Apparently it is a diplomatic way of cover a row.

UKIP BOSS NIGEL FARAGE - Updated 9 August, 2014

NIGEL FARAGE

UPDATE: 9 August, 2014 -- Farage is now standing for Parliament in 2015. UKip will not confirm Farage chosen Kent seat of South Thanet although his name is already on the list. As an excuse of his messing up the Newark by-election he stated that he wanted to stand for an area with which he had local connections.  Why did he campaign for the Newark by-election and spent all the money from the EU on it?  EU money which he should have used to promote EU's interest. What a twister!

UPDATE: 8 June, 2014 --  The result of the Newark by-election was that Conservatives won 17,431 -- UKip 10,028 -- Labour 6,842. The beaten candidate  Roger Helmer announced that it was mainly the fault of Nigel Farage not being there more often and campaigning. The general public's opinion is that Mr Farage seems to enjoy more the privileges of the EU and UK than being a serious contestant trying to win a seat in Parliament for his party.. 


Is Mr Farage really that short sighted that he does not realise the damage he does to his own party? There was a by-election in Newark which could have con him a seat in Parliament. He even mentioned before the by-election that he would throw the kitchen sink at the Tories. In other words he was completely committing himself to the campaign to win this set.

When it cam to it he flew to Malta to attend a meeting at give  a speech at a tourism conference. It is assumed that he would have received a sum of between £5,000 and £10,000. The exact figure is not known. What set more the gossip raging was that he was boozing all night and was seen to "guide" Travel chief Ande Soteri to the hotel. When questioned he denied it all that there was more than meet the eye.

Than he came out of his hotel room at 10.30am after having only a few hours sleep. A holidaymaker from England  asked him for a photo together to show his mates back home. The holdamaker stated that he would not vote for UKip but just wanted a picture. He further remark that by then it was 11am and Farage was smelling of booze, absolutely stinking.

Mr Farage being the leader of the UKip was enjoying the sun in Malta while he former Tory MEP Roger Helmer was left in Newark to carry on the campaign in torrential rain with temperature not more than 13 C

Just before Mr Farage delivering his speech he thought about Mr Helmer and tweeted "Find out how you can help Roger Helmer's by-election campaign in Newark." Very concerning.

At the conference some people laughed at his jokes but only some. Again he asked for a lot of criticism when he stated that he did not want to live live in a country where people speak different languages.One of the delegates pointed out that Malta is a multi-national and has is a bilingual nation.  Mr Farage forever makes racial remarks and yet he denies to be a racists. How contracting can one get?

At the end of the conference it was clear that inviting UKip Nigel Farage to give a speech had upset quite a number of people

Ian Tylor, Executive editor at the Travel Weekly Group wrote on his blog: "I was in two minds about attending the ITT conference this year, and talking to people around the venue I know I'm not alone. The reason is Nigel Farage. It was a mistake to invite him to speak, not because he represents a non-mainstream political party or appeals to populism or wishes to take Britain out of the European Union. It was a mistake because UKip is a racist party."

So there you have it. The bells are ringing louder and louder that the UKip are a racists'party and Mr Farage adds to it every time he opens his mouth with another racial remark.

TONY BLAIR SHOULD PAY £20MILLION COMPENSATION NOT TAXPAYERS Update 7 July, 2016

TONY BLAIR

Update: 7 July, 2016 -- Now the Chilcot report proved Blair decided single-handedly to invade Iraq he should be made to pay back £20million to the taxpayers. It is not right the taxpayers foot Blair's compensation to Iraqi people. Taxpayers are starving and homeless. 

This is another incredible decision made by the Coalition. The newspaper The Sun discovered that around £20million of taxpayers money had been paid as compensation to Iraquis since 2003.

The blog is not meant against Iraqis receiving compensation it only objects that taxpayers who are really hard-up having to pay it out.

It should be Tony Blair paying it.  
    .
He was determined to start a war.

He is gathered a wealth of approx. £100million,  maybe even more. They call him a 'human cash-machine' not for nothing, not in those circles. Therefore he must excel himself

  

The general public was completely against the war and invasion in Iraq so why do they have to pay for it. As it is they had to pay hundreds of millions of pounds to fight in Iraq plus  176 UK soldiers  lost their lives and a great number of young men were injured and are disabled for the rest of their lives. Instead of looking after them and paying compensation to these soldiers to make their life more durable the Department of Defence spending around £20million, so far, to Iraq, instead taking Tony Blair to court and make him pay it..

By all means they should get the money but it should not come from the Taxpayers. It should be paid by Tony Blair who was bent over backwards to invade Iraq under the false statement they had Weapon of Mass Destruction which were never found because they were never there. Tony Blair had been said, by financial experts, to be worth at least £100million and his own friends stated that it is under-estimated

Therefore my suggestion and it is not that wild since he was solely responsible for the death and devastation in Iraq he should be held responsible to pay. As it stands  of now he still would have at least £80million which is overpaid for his irresponsibility as a Prime Minister. Besides the war was illegal because the UN did not sanction it. So far he is not held responsible for any of that. On the contrary the UN gave him a post as their official Middle East Peace Envoy. To receive such a post after being the biggest war monger of recent years leave the credibility of the UN in doubt.

Legal companies Leigh Day and Public Interest's Lawyers handle all these cases. At the moment they still have 1,469 cases to bring against the Ministry of Defence. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond accused them of self-interest lawyers hiding behind the accuse of public interest. So far they pocket around £10million.  And what does the great Prime Minister David Cameron and his Cabinet do about it? Nothing. As long it does not cost his money it is all irrelevant. Never mind about the public being screwed into the ground.

BRITAIN'S £10BILLION FROM PROSTITUTION AND DRUGS -- Updated: 20 Sept.,2014

CHANCELLOR GEORGE OSBORNE

UPDATED:  20 Sept., 2014   --  This money coming from vile sources is planned to be included into the economy, now in the autumn budget. Desperately to show an increase in the economy.

Prostitution as such is not forbidden in the UK but curb-crawling, pimps, brothels are against the law. Yet, the Treasury accepts £10billion taxes coming from drugs and prostitution businesses which is against the law. 

This very fact explains why the Coalition is not fighting the drug lords. It is another shocking eye opener about the tactics of this Government. How much dirt is tolerated in Westminster or quietly encouraged? Prostitution had been around as long as human beings and most probably drugs too but it does not mean to tolerate it and on the quiet encouraging.  Especially drugs do destroy the younger generation and either they die of it or commit crimes like burglary and murder.

No the worst comes from the EU. They demand that the £10billion income must be included in the Office of National Statistics in Britain’s economy.  This dirty market is seen as a massive boost to Chancellor George Osborne raising the GDP. To get down to the correct figure statisticians will assess the rental value of brothels, sales of condoms and sales of clothes for sex workers.

 Regarding illegal drugs, the ONS will need he figures of production and sales of crack cocaine, powder cocaine, heroin, cannabis, ecstasy and amphetamines.  The information will include growing drugs or importing them as “production”. The buying of them for home use will be classed as “expenditure” and the sale as “income”.  This reads like a leaf out of the accounts from the Mafia.

This Coalition did nothing but ruined Britain and now they reveal trade of the worst. They get Britain down to the countries in Asia like Thailand which unfortunately was ruined by the American Army and now has a name for prostitution and drugs.

Can this Coalition, mainly the Tories, sink any lower? After this announcement of prostitution and drug trade seen as a boost to the economy is they really opened up the last door to being the worst.

It explains it all why the Border Agency does not act on tip off of drug mules.  According to the police’s reports it is as much as 2,000 a day.  According to the ONS it was already in 2009 an estimated £10billion for both trades. The real figure will never been known.

According to PM David Cameron in one of his recent speeches was promise that he will bring back power from Brussels. Is that what he was thinking of? Again Brussels dictates to the United Kingdom to include prostitution and drug trades in the ONS and this Government sees it as a boost to the economy. This mentality and non-existing principles makes every person in the street throw up.

This news  shows the “Government” for what they really are.  There was always prostitution and drug trade but to encourage it and use it as trade to boost the economy is unacceptable.  It can not be repeated often enough and soon enough to use your vote and not let it be wasted.  Use it wisely so Britain will get back to what it was a proud and decent country.

INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR -- Updated 19 August, 2020

Update 19 August, 2020 

It was reported, recently, that Blair put on all his papers of the Iraq War under the Official Secret Act for 70 years. To make sure the truth wont be known till such time.

Update 18 Sept., 2017 -- Recently it emerged that the full report was not published and MPs urging to publish the second part hoping it will more details and name Tony Blair.

Update:  After lots of pressure the Chilcot report was publish. Although very thorough but it did not name Tony Blair which would have brought him into The Hague Criminal Court.

Why again that cover-up? He brought UK into an illegal war which cost over one million lives and Iraq is worse off than ever.

UPDATE: It has now been confirmed that the publication of the Chilcot report will be on 6 July, 2016

Another failed promise -- Cameron promised to publish the papers before the 2015 General Election.  Now being elected the big silence has come down on it again. Who is he protecting? Blair or somebody else? As so many other inquiries it also ended up as a "white wash" costing taxpayers £7.5million which would have done the general public an awful lot of good if spend on them.

The result of this lengthy inquiry is that secret papers between Tony Blair and George Bush

 running up to the invasion in 2003 will not be published. They will only publish papers which had been already edited, in other words the important parts being blackened out. The announcement received heavy criticism. Even Sir John Major, ex-Prime Minister, advised Tony Blair it would be better if he allowed his papers to be published. He pointed out that a refusal would only raise suspicion and it will fester on it.

Labour MP John McDonnell said the deal meant Tony Blair had got his way. He said: "This confirms all the suspicions that people had that this inquiry will be a whitewash."

Former Labour MP Andrew MacKinlay described the inquiry as a "sham". Mr Mackinley, a member of the Commons foreign affairs committee at the time of the war, said: "I am not surprised that Chilcot has surrendered, It is a bad, bad day for democracy and justice, We were lied to as a country time and time again on Iraq, The lies endure."

It has to be pointed out at this point that a man died because being a highly qualified weapon inspector, Dr Kelly.  Tony Blair gave his name to the press and revealed that he is trying to find out whether there are Weapon of Mass Destruction.. Up to this day it had not been established why and by whom Dr Kelly died? The official verdict was suicide but many evidences speak against it. Was he going to spill the truth about the Weapon of Mass Destruction? It would have exposed George Bush and Tony Blair. It would also have stopped their plans to invade Iraq.

Years later, Dr Kelly's body was exhumed and cremated without the permission from his wife and family. It is certainly odd that somebody would have ordered this and without 

permission. It must have been to destroy all evidences of his death.

The Iraq war cost 179 UK soldiers lives. The Chilcot inquiry is also an insult to the families of those soldiers. They want and deserve to know the truth but as one mother Rose Gentle said: "I felt that Tony Blair was being allowed to walk away from the Iraq war. We don't think we'll get the truth now."

Labour MP Paul Flynn said: "The whole truth about the Iraq was required to give closure to the loved ones of the 179 soldiers killed.  The Chilcot Report will publish the truth, some of the truth but not the whole truth"

The inquiry was launched in 2009 and finished in 2011 and it took all this time and many demands to release the Chilcot Report.

One of the main supporter to keep these documents secret is Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood.  He was Mr Blair's principle private secretary and the PM's closest advisers in 1999.  Well that tells it all.